The circumstantial evidence is mounting that the Kremlin succeeded in infiltrating the US government at the highest levels.
How else to explain a newly elected American president:
– Diminishing United States of America defenses?
– Looking the other way after an act of Russian aggression?
– Agreeing to a farcically one-sided nuclear deal?
– Mercilessly mocking the idea that Russia represents our foremost geo-political foe?
– Accommodating the illicit nuclear ambitions of a Russian ally?
– Welcoming a Russian foothold in the Middle East?
– Refusing to provide arms to a sovereign country invaded by Russia?
– Pursuing a Moscow-friendly policy of hostility to fossil fuels?
All of these items, of course, refer to things said or done by President Barack Obama.
To take them in order: He re-set with Russia shortly after its clash with Georgia in 2008. He concluded the New START agreement with Moscow that reduced our nuclear forces but not theirs. When candidate Mitt Romney warned about Russia in the 2012 campaign, Obama rejected him as a Cold War relic.
The president then went on to forge an agreement with Russia’s ally Iran to allow it to preserve its nuclear program. During the red-line fiasco, he eagerly grasped a lifeline from Russia at the price of accepting its intervention in Syria. He never budged on giving Ukraine “lethal” weapons to defend itself from Russian attack.
Finally, Obama cut US defense spending and cracked down on fossil fuels — a policy that Russia welcomes, since its economy is dependent on high oil prices.
Put all of this together, and it’s impossible to conclude anything other than that Obama was a Russian stooge — and not out of any nefarious dealings, but out of his own naivete and weakness.
Read the full article here: Obama was a Russian stooge